The three phases of the social web

27 Nov

Web 2.0, a concept created by Tim O'Reilly in 2005, is useful. But it's only a concept, not a technology.

It's now possible to see progress within this concept. I suggest three defined phases, though there's much blurring at the edges.

Web 2.1: personal publishing

Blogs can be dated back to the late 1990s, but the power of personal publishing became evident around 2005 (WordPress and Typepad having both started in 2003).

In Web 2.1, individuals gained the power of the printing press and we saw the emergence of the conversational web through comments and trackbacks. Yet in a world where everyone can be an author, how many readers does each author attract? The answer is very few, except that the 1-9-90 rule puts blog authors as one in a hundred. So each logically has 100 readers, on average. But then power-law distribution kicks in, leaving most blogs with few readers and a few blogs on a par with major newspapers. So the true democratising power of personal publishing has never been realised.

At the time of Web 2.1, blogs were criticised for being hurried and inarticulate. Ironically they are now condemned for being slow and wordy (blog entries look like nineteenth century novels compared to 140 character tweets).

Web 2.2: user generated multimedia content

The next phase introduced audiovisual improvements and the quality of social communications.

Podcasting became popular with content creators, though podcasts have been a niche rather than mainstream habit amongst users. YouTube, from 2005, has been the major publishing phenomenon and the 'broadcast yourself' slogan sums up the spirit of the age.

How are podcasts and videos social? They are very conventional in terms of up-front editing skills, but become social through the filter of recommendation. Few people (beyond bored students) wait on YouTube for something interesting to come along. But everyone gets to know about the major hits through their social networks.

Social networks have always existed (we're tribal animals), but Web 2.2 introduced MySpace, Bebo (remember them?), Facebook and others including professional network LinkedIn and specific Ning-based networks. These are walled gardens with pleasure deriving from connections with and content from our 'friends'. The value of the network increases as members create and discuss content.

Web 2.3: the mobile web

The latest phase is characterised by the rise of the mobile internet. The Flickr photo sharing network belongs here (since digital cameras are universal on phones and click-and-share is a better description of how we use photography than click-and-print).

But the outstanding example of Web 2.3 is the twitter microblogging network. It takes personal publishing and conversations onto the mobile web and beyond the walled garden. Twitter isn't for everyone (it requires obsession, consumes time and poses security and privacy risks) but it has lowered the barriers to entry.

Nor does Twitter work well in isolation: Steve Rubel talks of a hub and spoke strategy in which Twitter can be used as a push channel to encourage visits and conversation at hub sites such as blogs. If Rubel's right, Web 2.3 is about 'lifestreaming' – the converging of all our social media footprints into one constantly updating stream.

Where now?

If, like me, this gives you a headache, then remember that these phases add to but don't necessarily replace the previous ones. We're living in a rich media landscape with a full spectrum of channels from private, one-to-one conversations through to many-to-many discussions and many-to-one broadcasts. Enjoy it all if you can – but also be prepared to switch off as much as you can.

One Response to “The three phases of the social web”

  1. Paul Seaman 27/11/2009 at 3:27 pm #

    The big thing really is convergence, which is the coming together of computing and communication. Moreover, 4G and beyond will see the mobile broadband internet become a reality. The problem with Web 2.0 is ideological with its cult of the amateur, worship of crowds and dismissal of past practice and professionalism. However, it seems to me that sense is coming back to the real world, not least when Barack Obama admits he’s never ever Twittered and can’t use the Blackberry he clutched throughout his campaign (something to do with clumsy fingers). My point is that old-style communication techniques clearly work with new media just as well as they did with old. Barack Obama showed us how (but not as advertised). More here:
    http://paulseaman.eu/2009/11/obama-doesnt-tweet-does-it-matter/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: