Who owns this stuff?

5 Sep

John Naughton fired so many broadsides at a teaching conference here on Monday that it’s taken me some time to get round to thinking about them all.

  • He called technology determinism ‘simply wrong’. ‘Focusing entirely on technology is the wrong way to go about this stuff… The future will be determined by how people and institutions shape these technologies.’
  • He attacked the fashion for ‘endism’ (eg ‘blogging marks the end of journalism’).
  • He provocatively called for the use of PowerPoint to be a dismissible offence (this to an audience of lecturers, remember).
  • He talked about how broadcast TV is losing its dominant place in the media ecosystem. ‘Broadcast TV is a push medium used by passive consumers.’
  • User-generated content is reversing the decline in the public sphere; ‘it’s a new organism in the media ecosystem’.
  • A defining challenge now is how to frame intellectual property rights to suit the digital economy. This is particularly apparent to those of us teaching ‘digital natives’ who simply see no end to their freedom to cut, paste and download (and so plagiarise). Naughton pointed to the work he and others did for the RSA to draft the Adelphi Charter on creativity, innovation and intellectual property.

I liked his sceptical tone, for example about the uses of Second Life. And I shared his confession about missing the boat with text messaging. As a mobile early adopter and a long-time user of email, he said he thought texts were ‘brain-dead emails’. Then teenagers gained mobiles and you know the rest.

3 Responses to “Who owns this stuff?”

  1. Karen Russell 05/09/2007 at 1:24 pm #

    Wow! Wish I could’ve been there. Won’t try to comment on everything, but I will say that I’ve been cutting back on PowerPoint with good effect — just using it when the content (like yesterday’s lecture on PR and the law) contains lots of specific names, numbers, definitions etc. and leaving it aside for more conceptual discussions of things like history, public opinion, or corporate culture.
    I’ll have to think about the rest of what he said.

  2. Richard Bailey 05/09/2007 at 2:17 pm #

    Karen
    On the subject of PowerPoint lectures, I’ve decided to experiment with ‘sixty second summaries’ at the start of my lectures to first year students. It suits the attention deficit, soundbite culture – and if I can’t summarise my content, I was probably waffling.

  3. Simon Collister 05/09/2007 at 3:22 pm #

    Nice stuff, Richard. Sounds like a good day. Technology determinism, wrong? Spot on!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: