What it’s not: event management

5 Sep

We’re about to welcome many new students onto our various courses, and one of our key tasks will be to shape their understanding of public relations as distinct from journalism, advertising, human resources and the many other disciplines it sometimes overlaps with and can be confused with.

First, event management. (For the sake of brevity, I’ve no intention of providing a reasoned and balanced view: this is a partial account based on personal experience.)

Event management skills and experience are useful in public relations: especially the ability to conceive and manage an event involving customers, media, staff or other stakeholders. But these skills are probably less useful today than they were 20 years ago because of the rise of technology and the expense of face-to-face meetings.

In brief, here’s the key difference in the disciplines. Public relations practitioners deal in ideas (shaping them, communicating them, persuading others of them); event managers deal in the practicalities of project plans (risks, costs, deadlines, dealing with suppliers). The two skills (ideas; planning) tend in my experience to be opposites. (I can only think of one colleague I’ve ever worked with who had equally strong skills in writing and in project management.)

Certain industry sectors are still very event-driven (eg motor industry launches; travel and tourism; fashion) but in general events are not an everyday occurrence in public relations (don’t believe the TV myth of celebrity parties). And not all events are media events.

Some students on my course will regret their choice and seek to move to event management (which they can also study at this university). I’m happy if this is their choice, though I also think there are great opportunites for public relations graduates in the public, private and not-for-profit sectors.

4 Responses to “What it’s not: event management”

  1. David Phillips 05/09/2005 at 8:26 pm #

    Richard, I have a short paper on domains of prcatice at: http://www.managementclarity.com/domians_of_pr_practice.pdf which may suggests a number of opportunities for study.

  2. Richard Bailey 07/09/2005 at 12:18 pm #

    Thanks, David. You’re truly an ideas factory and I’m hoping we’ll meet up again soon (in Leeds?).

  3. Gerald Chan 09/09/2005 at 11:53 am #

    Having been thrown into the deep end of events management when I’d first started in PR, I’d say that my early experience was a baptism of fire but it had a positive effect. Because you’re dealing with so many different groups, eg suppliers, speakers, venues, etc; and working to very tight deadlines and budgets, you learn very very quickly and your confidence as a practitioner develops accordingly.
    Many PR friends were involved in the activity of ringing around to check on releases and fielding press office calls. For a new PR recruit, this can be mundane and/or daunting. Imagine having to deal with an impatient and grumpy journo on the first day of work!
    I quite agree with your views Richard – PR is strategic, while events management is ultimately tactical. But you need to master the tactical before you can move on to the higher level stuff. Plus, planning and running events can be fun and are a good exercise for students, which is why the CIPR approved course reps are given the task of holding an event at their college for their classmates!

  4. My Weblog 12/09/2005 at 12:45 am #

    PR Studies

    Link: PR Studies. Excellent blog. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: