For the benefit of IPR Advanced Certificate candidates who are reading around the concept of integrated marketing communications, take a look at this broadside from Al Ries. It’s specialisation, not intergration, that’s needed, he argues. (Via PR Machine.)
One Response to “All-in-one or best of breed?”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
The author
My tweets
- A @leedsbeckett #PR graduate alerts me to some paid and voluntary #prstudent #placement opportunities working on th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 months ago
- Thinking who I know in Canada. Good start to the match @jgombita @priyabates (despite the penalty). #FIFAWorldCup 4 months ago
- I’m lecturing at 1pm and teaching straight after. Trying to recall when I last ignored an England World Cup game (m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 months ago
- #CommsPets take two https://t.co/hzB6MUvnvk 4 months ago
- #CommsPets. Keeping them here while I muck out. https://t.co/H89f8n3ePw 4 months ago
My latest Instagram photos
No Instagram images were found.
Content
Academic Behind the Spin Books Branding Business Campaigns Careers Celebrities Consultancy Consumer Corporate communications Crisis education and training Marketing Media Media relations Online PR People Personal Politics PR history Profession Publishing Social media Spin Students Uncategorized Web/Tech Weblogs Writing
His point seems to be that specialization occurs, and splintering is the overwhelming tendency in the industry. This is an empirical observation, but is not a proof that umbrella-type solutions arent working.
I think there are 2 separate points to be made; the second one is the one the author doesn’t see. Now more than ever there’s a need for real, specialized skills and functions, now more than ever, there’s a need to unite these into a consistent and credible campaign.